The estimation of interspike interval (ISI) distributions from experimental data is a common method to study neuronal variability given a certain stationary input. In a typical experiment, the spike train of a single neuron (e.g., a neuron in visual cortex) is recorded while driven by a constant stimulus. The stimulus might be an external input applied to the system (e.g., a visual contrast grating moving at constant speed); or it may be an intracellularly applied constant driving current. The spike train is analyzed and the distribution of intervals between two subsequent spikes is plotted in a histogram. For a sufficiently long spike train, the histogram provides a good estimate of the ISI distribution which we denote as ; cf. Fig. 7.9. The interval distribution can be interpreted as a conditional probability density
(7.12) |
where is the probability that the next spike occurs in the interval given that the last spike occurred at time .
A | B |
---|---|
In order to extract the mean firing rate from a stationary interval distribution , we start with the definition of the mean interval,
(7.13) |
The mean firing rate is the inverse of the mean interval
(7.14) |
Interspike interval distributions derived from a spike train under stationary conditions can be broad or sharply peaked. To quantify the width of the interval distribution, neuroscientists often evaluate the coefficient of variation, short , defined as the ratio of the standard deviation and the mean. Therefore the square of the is
(7.15) |
where and . A Poisson process produces distributions with . A value of , implies that a given spike train is less regular than a Poisson process with the same firing rate. If , then the spike train is more regular. Most deterministic integrate-and-fire neurons fire periodically when driven by a constant stimulus and therefore have . Intrinsically bursting neurons, however, can have .
Example: Poisson process with absolute refractoriness
We study a Poisson neuron with absolute refractory period . For times since last spike larger than , the neuron is supposed to fire stochastically with rate . The interval distribution of a Poisson process with absolute refractoriness (Fig. 7.10A) is given by
(7.16) |
and has a mean and variance . The coefficient of variation is therefore
(7.17) |
Let us compare the of Eq. (7.17) with that of a homogeneous Poisson process of the same mean rate . As we have seen, a Poisson process has . A refractory period lowers the , because a neuron with absolute refractoriness fires more regularly than a Poisson neuron. If we increase , we must increase the instantaneous rate in order to keep the same mean rate . In the limit of , the approaches zero, since the only possible spike train is regular firing with period .
© Cambridge University Press. This book is in copyright. No reproduction of any part of it may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.